Open Questions - Playground: Provenpackagers

Honza Horak hhorak at
Thu Mar 27 06:53:03 UTC 2014

On 03/26/2014 08:05 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> Will there be co-maintainers, Provenpackagers in the Playground repo?
> Proposal:
> Yes, there must be commaintainers and provenpackagers.
> If we use software we might be able to add to
> one copr repo more users who can maintain it. We can just copy Fedora
> provenpackagers list.

+1 That makes sense to me. Provenpackagers have already some higher 
level of trust, so I don't see any reason to create non-necessary work 
to create some new apparatus.

We may talk about creating some new Playground SIG, so pure Playground 
provenpackagers don't have to become provenpackagers some other way 
(like joining some other SIG).


> Let's use the same system, which we used for approval of Playground
> repo: mirroring. No disapproval on mailing list means approval on next
> meeting.
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks at

More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list