Proposal for integration tests infrastructure

[Tim Flink]

On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:22:27 +0100
Honza Horak <hhorak at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 10/28/2014 08:08 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > Note that any or all of the above may be appropriate, depending on
> > the exact nature of the specific tests.
> >
> > For example, there are already some public Beaker installer tests at
> > https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa/fedora-beaker-tests  for execution on
> > http://beaker.fedoraproject.org/
> 
> I didn't know about this instance, interesting.

It's currently a dev instance (read: not backed up, best-effort level
of support) mostly due to some issues in the instance. The beaker devs
are aware of the issue and hopefully there will be a fix before too
long.

Once that fix is released, we still need to make a full production
system and that'll take some doing - not impossible but not really
trivial. We're trying to get that all figured out but as a short
summary: a working, production beaker instance for fedora will take a
bit of time once beaker is fully compatible with how things are set up
in infra. How long depends on overall priority and if a couple details
work out the way we hope.

I'm happy to go into more details but will skip them for the sake of
brevity on a large distribution cross-posted thread.

> Can anybody shortly explain the plan with this instance, if there is 
> any? It would make sense to me to use Taskotron to run Beaker tests
> at http://beaker.fedoraproject.org, but maybe there are some other
> plans?

That's pretty much what we have in mind, yeah.

Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/attachments/20141103/ecb7b589/attachment.sig>