Roadmap for Mono packages in Fedora ?

[Jaroslav Reznik]

----- Original Message -----
> Not sure what you agreed, but I can imagine that I want in Fedora latest
> Ruby on Rails and in Playground maintain its older (still supported)
> releases (or vice versa).

This leads to the question I've raised a long time ago - do we want one
fits them all "repository" or more tailored repositories?

And that time we agreed - let's start with one Playground repository,
more limited in what can be there and if it works, let's take a look
on more. And I think it still make sense to start with smaller steps.

Supplementary, Playground, Fresh, Oldies repos...

Jaroslav

> 
> And no, doing rename reviews etc to maintain older releases in Fedora
> does not scale.
> 
> 
> Vít
> 
> 
> 
> Dne 10.4.2015 v 17:30 Honza Horak napsal(a):
> > Haven't we agreed two weeks ago that playground packages shouldn't
> > conflict with base system? that means new versions won't be in
> > playground, for those pure copr should be enough.. the playground is
> > supposed to be more for packages that cannot be in fedora due
> > packaging guidelines issues (bundling is great example). At least this
> > what I got from the meeting two weeks ago..
> >
> > Honza
> >
> > On 04/10/2015 02:46 PM, White, Langdon wrote:
> >> Seems like a great oppty for a playground example... think envs and
> >> stacks could follow up on this and help these guys get the existing mono
> >> build they have in to playground while pkg reviews and the like take
> >> place?
> >>
> >> langdon
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: "Timotheus Pokorra" <timotheus.pokorra at solidcharity.com
> >> <mailto:timotheus.pokorra at solidcharity.com>>
> >> Date: Apr 10, 2015 2:38 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Roadmap for Mono packages in Fedora ?
> >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >> <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> >> Cc:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> this is my first post to this list. My name is Timotheus Pokorra, I am
> >> from Germany, and I am also interested to get an uptodate version of
> >> Mono into Fedora and later into CentOS or Epel.
> >> I am developing and deploying OpenPetra, an administration software
> >> under GPL for charities and mission organisations, on CentOS.
> >> https://www.openpetra.org
> >> I am maintaining Mono packages on OBS for various linux distributions:
> >> https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/home:tpokorra:mono
> >> Obviously it is quite easy because there are no rules to follow.
> >> I understand that a distribution like Fedora needs packaging rules,
> >> and the rules have a good reason.
> >>
> >>  > I am not working on this currently. Some one should inform upstream
> >>  > that it doesn't build for GCC 5 / C++ 11.
> >> It seems that Mono 4.0 Alpha1 builds fine on Rawhide:
> >> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/elsupergomez/mono-4/build/85185/
> >>
> >> I have added a comment to:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089426
> >>
> >> IMHO I think we should focus on getting Mono 4.0 into Fedora
> >> (according to the "First" foundation of Fedora...)
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >>    Timotheus
> >> --
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> > _______________________________________________
> > env-and-stacks mailing list
> > env-and-stacks at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
> 
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
>