Cooperation with other WGs on Rings and E&S position in this effort

Colin Walters walters at
Mon Aug 24 21:54:58 UTC 2015

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 08:01 AM, Honza Horak wrote:

> We kind of agreed that E&S should lead the development of rings concept, 
> which means to approach other WGs with guidelines about what rings 
> borders are and the WGs will be responsible for defining the rings. Ring 
> 0+1 would be for example work for Base WG.

Let me admit I have lost track of what's going on
with rings/modularization.  Is this the page to use:,_Requirements_Phase

More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list