Cooperation with other WGs on Rings and E&S position in this effort
hhorak at redhat.com
Tue Aug 25 15:24:42 UTC 2015
On 08/25/2015 10:11 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 11:54 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 08:01 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
>>> We kind of agreed that E&S should lead the development of rings concept,
>>> which means to approach other WGs with guidelines about what rings
>>> borders are and the WGs will be responsible for defining the rings. Ring
>>> 0+1 would be for example work for Base WG.
>> Let me admit I have lost track of what's going on
>> with rings/modularization. Is this the page to use:
> This is definitely related, another, a bit older is this one:
> Some summary of what position of E&S is supposed to be and what is our
> mission and more concrete plans in the Fedora.next initiative is
> something to be written so far.
Well, as I finally got to read the thread "RepoFunnel and the Software
Component Pipeline", I feel this is somewhat similar to what I meant to
be written. Thanks Nick!
More information about the env-and-stacks