Latest thoughts on user level package management
msuchy at redhat.com
Fri Jun 19 07:24:14 UTC 2015
Dne 18.6.2015 v 17:42 Honza Horak napsal(a):
> As for Aleph 4, the copr makes also sense to me, since at least part of the infrastructure would be shared. Mirku, what
> would you say about building also non-rpm content in copr? Does it make sense to you at all?
That really depends what really "redistributed component" is.
Is it Docker image? That would be huge work. And we will have to adopt OSBS, which is not final yet. Lots of months of work.
Is it ruby gem? Is it npm package? Each of them would require more than month work. And it actually depends how good is
the underlying tool. I spent a lot of work on mock to get better building of RPM and to fix bugs which caused us problems.
It may happen that I will be forced to spent some times on gem, npm and other tools.
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
More information about the env-and-stacks