Log from todays meeting

[Rex Dieter]

Karsten Wade wrote:


> So, similarly, EPEL could:
...
> * Agree not to package something that is already in another repo,
> instead referring to that repo and package in particular (cf.
> fedoraforum.org and pointing at not-illegal solutions there)

Currently not possible/practical in many cases, since by policy, epel
packages current can't (Build)Requires anything outside of epel.

-- Rex