Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-02-27

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Thu Feb 28 21:03:00 UTC 2008


On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:15:02 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:08:09 -0000, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote:
> >
> >  > ======================================================================
> >  > Broken packages in fedora-epel-5-i386:
> >  >
> >  >     amavisd-new-2.4.5-1.el5.noarch  requires  perl(Archive::Zip)
> >  >     evolution-bogofilter-0.2.0-5.el5.1.i386  requires  libeutil.so.0
> >  >     mail-notification-evolution-plugin-4.0-2.el5.i386  requires  libeutil.so.0
> >  >     mlvirsh-0.3.3.0-6.el5.i386  requires  libvirt.so.0
> >  >     ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-6.el5.i386  requires  libvirt.so.0
> >  >     ooo2txt-0.0.6-3.el5.noarch  requires  perl(Archive::Zip)
> >  >     virt-top-0.3.3.0-6.el5.i386  requires  libvirt.so.0
> >
> >  The RHEL virtualisation pkgs are in a separate repo. This is
> >  missing in the yum cfg.
> >
> >  As why  perl(Archive::Zip)  is missing in RHEL5 and not CentOS5
> >  puzzles me (right now -- I've not examined it). Same applies to
> >  libeutil.so.0 as that is evidence of an ABI-incompatible update
> >  somewhere.
> >
> 
> It has to do with the various 'channels': perl(Archive::Zip) and
> thunderbird do not seem to be in the server channels but are in the
> client channels.. I am guessing there are vice versa ones too... I run
> into this quite a bit which is why we ended up with a non standard
> through it all into one repo to do our installs from.

Right. I see it was run against a RHEL5 Server repo and apparently not
against what the buildsys uses.

Btw, the rc-report script can take multiple repoclosure output files as
in input arguments. No need to concatenate them.




More information about the epel-devel mailing list