Broken deps report incomplete? (was: Re: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2009-02-08)
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun Feb 8 12:46:14 UTC 2009
Hi!
On 08.02.2009 12:49, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote:
> ======================================================================
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>
> ======================================================================
> Broken packages in fedora-epel-5-i386:
>
> NetworkManager-pptp-0.6.4-2.el5.i386 requires NetworkManager = 1:0.6.4
I just prepared a testing -> stable move and noticed a few broken deps
in epel5 that are not in this list.
---
$ setarch i686 repoclosure -n -r centos${EPELVER} -r epel${EPELVER} |
grep -A 2 'from epel5'
package: gyachi-plugin-photo_album-1.1.46-4.el5.i386 from epel5
unresolved deps:
gyachi = 0:1.1.46-4.el5
--
package: php-pear-Image-Graph-roman-0.7.2-2.el5.noarch from epel5
unresolved deps:
php-pear-Image-Graph = 0:0.7.2-2.el5
package: php-pear-Image-Graph-words-0.7.2-2.el5.noarch from epel5
unresolved deps:
php-pear-Image-Graph = 0:0.7.2-2.el5
package: python-fedora-infrastructure-0.2.90.22-1.el5.noarch from epel5
unresolved deps:
python-fedora = 0:0.2.90.22-1.el5
package: revisor-delta-2.0.5.1-4.el5.noarch from epel5
unresolved deps:
revisor = 0:2.0.5.1-4.el5
package: revisor-jigdo-2.0.5.1-4.el5.noarch from epel5
unresolved deps:
revisor = 0:2.0.5.1-4.el5
package: revisor-rebrand-2.0.5.1-4.el5.noarch from epel5
unresolved deps:
revisor = 0:2.0.5.1-4.el5
package: revisor-virt-2.0.5.1-4.el5.noarch from epel5
unresolved deps:
revisor = 0:2.0.5.1-4.el5
package: vala-docs-0.1.5-5.el5.i386 from epel5
unresolved deps:
vala = 0:0.1.5-5.el5
---
Took a closer look and found that for example the revisor version that
is missing for revisor-* above is actually in the repo:
http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/epel/5/i386/revisor-2.0.5.1-4.el5.noarch.rpm
But there is also a newer one which thus breaks the deps:
http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/epel/5/i386/revisor-2.0.5.2-1.el5.noarch.rpm
Anyone any idea why the script doesn't detect this? Or am I missing
something?
CU
knurd
More information about the epel-devel
mailing list