python-iniparse should not be in EPEL5

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Monday 19 January 2009 01:59:39 am Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 09:43 +0200, David Juran wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I just noticed that python-iniparse got pushed into EPEL5 over the
> > weekend. However python-iniparse.0.2.3-4.el5 is already in the RHEL5
> > channel and that version should not be overridden by EPEL. Could someone
> > with the appropriate permissions please remove that it.
It has been in EPEL for much longer.  we really need to have word from RH when 
they add things shipped in EPEL.

> > On a side-note, this is not the first time this happens. Would it make
> > sense to implement some kind of sanity check in the push script that
> > flags if a EPEL package is overriding a RHEL package?
>
> You are correct. This is not the first time that a package previously in
> EPEL is added to RHEL. Nor will this be the last time.
Its being removed in the push im doing right now.

Dennis

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20090119/aa5f119e/attachment.sig>