RHEL 5.3

[Robert Scheck]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm not sure why you think you and pexpect are so special.  We've done
> this many times in the past and it works just fine.

I'm not sure why you are still thinking, that we need to break things by
removing the package: It won't break more as Red Hat already has broken by
not incrementing release of ENVRA when importing it from EPEL into RHEL.

As we figgured out in this thread before, the only real way is to increment
release on Red Hat side and freeze the package in EPEL or keep ENVRA of it
in EPEL below ENVRA of it in RHEL.


Greetings,
  Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20090123/2eb50028/attachment.sig>