New git in EPEL?
Todd Zullinger
tmz at pobox.com
Fri Aug 27 20:08:00 UTC 2010
R P Herrold wrote:
>>Do you have the emacs-git package installed? And do you use the
>>emacs git integration? That's the part that needs some love, as
>>upstream git now rely's on the files shipped as part of emacs >=
>>22.2.
>
> nope -- using one operating iscomplex enough for me ;)
Haha, I completely understand.
>>An emacs user who can help us find and test a good solution is what
>>we need.
>
> * nod * thus my poke to smooge, as to some testing
I did notice since I posted the other day that it's not git-init.el
that's different between us and RPMForge. The trouble is in the lack
of a vc-git.el script in newer upstream releases. The RPM Forge
packages don't do anything about this, so I would presume that they
either haven't noticed the change or don't care enough about emacs
support to let it hold up a nice git update (which I can understand).
If there are as many emacs-git users of the RPM Forge packages as
there are of the EPEL packages, I can see how simply dropping that
functionality could easily go unnoticed. :)
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20100827/2b19518c/attachment.sig>
More information about the epel-devel
mailing list