nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel

[Manuel Wolfshant]

On 01/13/2010 06:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
>   
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:41:00AM -0800, Christopher wrote:
>>     
>>> Possibly RH could use a one-higher Epoch in their channels.  Everybody
>>> wins.
>>>       
>> That's the path of madness. Let's please not encourage it.
>>
>>     
>
> We also checked and rpm doesn't allow us to use an EPOCH of -1 (for
> even more madness).
>
> I think in the end, we are going to either rebuild what they have in
> that channel OR not ship it. Joy.
>
>   
or recommend using yum-priorities and use priority=1 for base / updates 
/ RHN and >=2 for EPEL.