ppc is still a primary platform for epel-6?

[Adam Goode]

On 07/29/2010 09:24 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 06:19:56 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> is ppc still a primary platform for epel-6?
>> it seems from this build log that a noarch rpm can go to a ppc builder:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2355225&name=root.log
> 
> ppc no, ppc64 yes.  rhel 6 has switched the default userland on power arches 
> to ppc64,  there is compatability rpms for ppc however likely not enough for 
> EPEL's needs.  so epel-6 builds for i686, x86_64 and ppc64,  we could 
> potentially do s390x also if there is enough demand
> 

Is it possible to get shell access to a ppc64 machine with at least 1GB
of RAM? I would like to bootstrap the mlton compiler for ppc64 so it can
be built for el6. (Likewise I'd need access to an s390x machine if EPEL
starts supporting that.)


Thanks,

Adam

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20100730/977a7b67/attachment.sig>