EPEL Updating Puppet to 2.7.x

Stephen John Smoogen smooge at gmail.com
Wed Aug 7 15:31:49 UTC 2013


On 6 August 2013 10:30, Sam Kottler <skottler at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've had this conversation at least once before, but I figured I would bring it up again [1].
>
> You can see in Mike's original post that there a number of reasons we should bump to the 2.7 series in EPEL, but primarily it's because critical bug fixes aren't ending up in the 2.6 series any longer. I don't want to completely rehash the conversation in the old thread, but I think that it's important for EPEL to be providing updates on a maintained branch so I'd like to propose that both EPEL 5 & EPEL 6 packages get bumped to 2.7. This plan will largely avoid the issues that come with the potentially tricky upgrade path for users between 2.x and 3.x.
>
> Thoughts?

I think both to 2.7.x sounds workable with the usual trumpets and
fanfare to let people know that clients and/or servers going to 2.7
might have problems if not done syncronously...


> -Sam
>
> 1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2012-October/msg00043.html
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list
> epel-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.


More information about the epel-devel mailing list