EPEL RFC: Strategy for python3 versions

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Tue Apr 29 23:59:46 UTC 2014

On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:54:31 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:


> What do people think?  Is this something we can do within the
> policies of EPEL?  Does it make sense to go forward with this?  Is it
> better to go with one of the alternatives?

I like the plan. I'm happy to help co-maintain/package monkey versions. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20140429/2cc5e57f/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel mailing list