EPEL quick epel7 update

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:03:57 +0200
Simone Caronni <negativo17 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On 16 June 2014 20:15, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> 
> > * When do we want to look at leaving beta status for epel7?
> > I'd suggest we should definitely give CentOS time to release, but
> > should we have any other critera?
> >
> 
> I would really, really like to have CentOS 7 available before the
> final release. 

I don't disagree. ;) 

> CentOS 7 is being built also for i386 and that would
> mean a lot of semplification into adding packages in EPEL 7. Right
> now the situation is a bit weird as many multilib dependencies cannot
> be satisfied and there are many obstacles in getting i386 binaries to
> run.

That however, is another kettle of fish. ;) 

So, you are suggesting we move to building against CentOS instead of
RHEL and support 32bit? Where is the CentOS 32bit effort at?

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20140616/d315899c/attachment.sig>