EPEL rhel-extras

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 25 June 2014 11:27, Michael Stahnke <stahnma at puppetlabs.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>
>> ok, not much discussion here, but it seems like everyone is ok with
>> just saying rhel-extras is something we don't conflict with.
>>
>
> One question I have is how long this decision is valid for. Right now, I
> think the proposal is the best decision. 3 years from now, we may have
> different opinions. 7 years from now, we really might. Does this decision
> last the 10 years that RHEL does or can we revisit at some point, if
> required?
>
>
Good question.. and leads into my next email about EPEL.next... what do
people see as the challenges and future of EPEL.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20140625/de0e8d6e/attachment.html>