EPEL and SCL

Jim Perrin jperrin at centos.org
Thu Mar 20 23:13:19 UTC 2014



On 03/20/2014 05:15 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

> I have been thinking about this and wondering if SCL's might be better
> under Robyn's "EPIC" (Extra Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds) 


I hate that name, but the idea behind the repo is sound.

> would be something that could have less rigid rules for keeping going for
> 12 years that would be more in line with SCL's 2-3 year lifetimes. I was
> going to bring it up as a FLOCK talk to get the ball running with possible
> interaction with the CentOS group (maybe joining with their SCL
> operations). Does that make sense?
> 

It makes sense to me as well. Could you elaborate a bit on how you
envision this working? What role do you see CentOS playing? (yes I'm
impatient and don't want to wait for FLOCK :-P )


-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77


More information about the epel-devel mailing list