[EPEL-devel] Python 3 discussion

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 07:46:00 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda at redhat.com> wrote:

> > ^ Is this step part of a coordinated mass-rebuild, or is this just a
> > period of time after we make the announcement: "Hey Packagers: be
> > sure to rebuild for python35"?
> 
> That's a good question. I guess we should standardize how this will
> be done. Something like:
> - there's an announcement on epel-devel that python35 is the "main
> python3" and packagers should rebuild their packagers (and users
> their apps/scripts/...)
> - wait for a week (two?)
> - open bugs for packages that haven't been rebuilt during the
> previous week and get them fixed ASAP

I'd say just doing the mass rebuild by a provenpackager or the like
would be easier than filing bugs and waiting. 

Also, we need to coordinate the update with them in it... ideally they
would all be in the same update?

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20150303/66da0d5f/attachment.sig>