[FAmSCo] Mentor nominee deliberations

[Joerg Simon]

Am Dienstag, 6. April 2010 01:10:28 schrieb David Nalley:
> I don't disagree; a public and transparent process is good.
> If we continue to keep such discussions public how do we do so in a
> way that remains respectful and encouraging without sacrificing the
> integrity of the process?

As long as we consider - "How would i feel, if i would be the person in 
question?", we are on the right way. Maybe IRC is not the right place because 
there is less response-time to think over. 

I also expect, that if a Mentor proposes a new Mentor Candidate, the Candidate 
should really be ready to become a Mentor - to avoid such unworthy 
discussions. 
As example: 
A very Active Packager is not automaticaly a good Ambassador or Ambassador 
Group Mentor in the same way i would be a horrible Packaging Sponsor ;)

He should have at least some visibility inside the Ambassadors Group, he has 
mentored some Ambassadors already together with the other Mentor to learn the 
process and he should also be connected and already visible to the global 
community so we see the work that is done in Ambassadors!

Maybe we should work on this in the next Mentors Meeting. 
But i do not want to make more new hard rules. But if we had, we could have 
avoid the previous discussions.

In this special case, i never gave a hard -1 until i was forced to do so - i 
gave my answer and i think it is clear what i expect.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/famsco/2010-March/000103.html


cu Joerg
-- 
Joerg (kital) Simon
jsimon at fedoraproject.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon
http://kitall.blogspot.com
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/famsco/attachments/20100406/a88a6366/attachment.bin