[FAmSCo] Agenda for 2010-12-11 meeting
ppapadeas at gmail.com
Sun Dec 5 22:07:39 UTC 2010
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Pierros Papadeas <ppapadeas at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Hello all!
>> As promised this is the thread to discuss the agenda of the upcoming
>> FAmSCo meeting.
>> Right now the action items listed on the agenda page  are :
>> == Continuation of the work done in the Ambassadors FAQ . ==
>> This item was taken by Susmit and it would be nice if someone of us could
>> take care of it from now on. The wiki page FAQ still needs some more info
>> and answers imho. I suggest we leave the action item and try to continue
>> working on that.
> Is this something that needs to be continuously updated enough to keep it
> on the agenda? It seems to me that once the documentation is in place, it
> can be removed from agenda although someone needs to be responsible for
> keeping it updated and I can volunteer for doing that since I maintain bits
> and pieces of docs elsewhere within Fedora.
Ok so I believe that this topic should be on our agenda once and then we can
have someone assigned to it, like Rahul said and just give seasonal reports
>> == Our Ambassador Conduct needs some love ?  ==
>> We have to review and decide what we would like from the Ambassador
>> Conduct page. Any suggestions are welcome :)
> We could collaborate with the newly established community work group who is
> in charge of forming a code of conduct for all of Fedora.
Can be done, but focusing on Ambassadors also would help CWG to form a nice
code of conduct. Again setting someone responsible for that (with regular
reports) would be great.
>> == Chairman Election ==
>> We need to elect a new chairman for FAmSCo :) I am still looking on how
>> this was done before, but as we are only 7 I believe we can manage a simple
> How did it work in the past? One more suggestion that I have for FAmSCo
> is run to a Ambassador specific survey that gets information on what are the
> issues they think we should address. It will help set the broad overall
This sounds like a different item so please update the agenda with that so
we can have a decision on that. I am totally ok with that as this could act
as an initial step for established process of having community feedback :)
PGP key: 0x6130DBF8
pierros at papadeas.gr
liknus @ GRnet , Freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the famsco