[FAmSCo] FAmSCo Leadership

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at gmail.com
Tue Mar 15 08:54:41 UTC 2016


2016-03-14 15:48 GMT+01:00 Giannis Konstantinidis <giannis at konstantinidis.cc>:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'd like to open up a new thread regarding the status of the committee's
> leadership. I can assume you know the story, so I'm not going to explain
> things again.

Hi Giannis,

thanks for following up on this. Is there any particular reason for
you to start a new thread? Just wondering, because I'd really love to
have my questions from the previous thread answered.

> Based on what Cristoph suggested on a previous e-mail to the list, I also
> see three viable options:
>
> 1. Continue with the current leadership.
> 2. Re-open the previous round of elections and allow Cristoph to vote.
> 3. Have a new round of elections.

Glad to see you've eliminated option 4 to dissolve FAmSCo. What made
you change your mind?

Given these three options, I'd go for third.

> Another important thing, as you can understand, is inactivity. We need to
> become more active and participate in the committee's proceedings. Even if
> not everyone can be present during the meetings, there are several other
> channels (such as this mailing list and also the FAmSCo trac) to consider.

Amen, I totally agree with you on this one. As far as I can see the
problem is not *using* the tools but *connecting* them, that's why we
are facing this split-brain situation atm: When I tried to catch up
lately, I found several tickets where a discussion on IRC had taken
place, but no note and no log was added to the ticket. On the other
hand I read meeting logs where the you linked to the ticket, but
nobody actually responded to the comment I had added to the ticket
earlier.

Whoever is in charge of hosting the meeting needs to make sure this
gets done right. The links need to go both ways.

> Jflory7 was also kind enough to make a proposal, which I do believe will
> work very well in our case. Please have a look and vote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/390

I'm fine with lazy consensus, but I have a concern about the time
frame and a suggestions on how to collect voted. Please refer to
https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/390#comment:5 for details.

Best regards,
Christoph


More information about the famsco mailing list