[FAmSCo] FAmSCo Meeting Minutes 2016-03-16

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at gmail.com
Wed Mar 16 18:18:13 UTC 2016


2016-03-16 16:51 GMT+01:00 Giannis Konstantinidis <giannis at konstantinidis.cc>:
>
> * The majority of us is in favor of lazy consensus. However, those of us
> present in the meeting believe that 3 days will be a very short time frame
> for people to respond. Please check Ticket #390 on trac and respond.
> https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/390

For those not present in the meeting: Please note that this majority
only consisted of four people. Remy was pushing for a decision, but
given that we had barely reached the quorum (at least we did, yay!), I
think it's better to continue the discussion first, especially since
Sirko had already uttered some concerns in trac.

@Sirko: See? That's basically already lazy consensus. ;-) Even though
you are skeptic, you should be glad we did not make a decision yet.
And even with lazy consensus, we can still overpower you later. That's
why I don't understand your skepticism, we should at least give it a
shot.

> * We discussed the idea of every FAmSCo voting to take place on trac. I have
> just opened a ticket about this, please check it out for more info:
> https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/391

I think we should discuss this as part of of #390 because this is
where the idea stems from, where I made a proposal and others already
voted.

> * We have to try our best to find a specific time and/or day for meetings
> that will work for most people. Please fill out this poll If you haven't
> already: http://whenisgood.net/new-famsco-meeting

We currently have responses from 5 people, Gnokii and Luis are still missing.

The preliminary results at
http://whenisgood.net/new-famsco-meeting/results/x9y7ch7 indicate that
we probably need several iterations. We'll ask the least flexible
persons to revisit their votes and see where we get.

Best regards,
Christoph


More information about the famsco mailing list