<p>I guess kital means we still need to have a famco member to make final decisions to things. Such person can still delegate current fama with what they had been doing, but always there to look after things in case? </p>
<p>K410</p>
<p>Rgds, Caius 'kaio' Chance. <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:kaio">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:kaio</a></p>
<p>On 16/12/2010 12:30 AM, "Larry Cafiero" <<a href="mailto:larry.cafiero@gmail.com">larry.cafiero@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Joerg Simon <<a href="mailto:jsimon@fedoraproject.org">jsimon@fedoraproject.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I think Fabian, Susmit, Robert and me we like our duties on that, but<br>
>> can understand that if you are not happy how Membership work is done to<br>
>> exchange people - no hard feelings.<br>
><br>
><br>
> No, no, no Joerg -- we are VERY happy with the way Fabian, Susmit, Robert and you are doing things. I think it was unclear about whether the assignments had to go to FAmSCo members or whether they can be done by others.<br>
><br>
> Thank you for clearing that up.<br>
><br>
> Please keep doing the great job you're doing -- and please keep doing the membership and mentoring part of it as well!<br>
><br>
> Larry Cafiero<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> famsco mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:famsco@lists.fedoraproject.org">famsco@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/famsco">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/famsco</a><br>
</p>