[Fedora-join] [Fwd: 5tFTW: F21 Alpha, Shellshock, Schedule Docs Update, Flock 2015 Locations, and a Fedora User Committee idea (2014-09-26)]

Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 05:02:05 UTC 2014


A little late, but this post includes important information on what's
happening. If you've read about Shellshock, this is worth reading:

-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Matthew Miller
<snip>
> Subject: 5tFTW: F21 Alpha, Shellshock, Schedule Docs Update, Flock
> 2015 Locations, and a Fedora User Committee idea (2014-09-26)
> 
> Reposted from <http://fedoramagazine.org/5tftw-2014-09-26/>.
> 
> Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
> highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
> It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
> to each. Here are the five things for September 18th, 2014:
> 
> 
> Fedora 21 Alpha Release!
> ------------------------
> 
> Of course, this week’s big news is the release of Fedora 21 Alpha — the
> first formal test release on the way to an early-December final
> release. This will be our first release with distinct Cloud, Server,
> and Workstation products — a first phase of Fedora.next. Read the F21
> Alpha release announcement, and download the flavor you’re interested
> in (or launch the cloud image in EC2).
> 
> A gigantic thank you and congratulations to all of the Fedora
> contributors who made this happen!
> 
> * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next
> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F21_Alpha_release_announcement
> * http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
> * https://console.aws.amazon.com/ec2/v2/home?region=us-east-1#LaunchInstanceWizard:ami=ami-20268848
> 
> 
> Shellshock and Fedora
> ---------------------
> 
> And then, this is our *other* big news. By now, this has been
> well-covered *everywhere*, but if you haven’t seen it yet, check out
> articles tagged `shellshock` on Fedora Magazine to keep your system
> safe.
> 
> If you’re curious, read my "Shellshock: How does it actually work?"
> article, where I attempt to give a satisfying level of detail in a way
> that anyone can understand. Also, the Red Hat security blog has a nice
> post-incident FAQ, with a lot of other background and information, and
> explains the reasoning behind the patch Red Hat developed (which is the
> one we are using in Fedora).
> 
> You might also be interested Dan Walsh’s blog entry on how SELinux
> helps contain this attack — it’s not perfect, but when an exploit is
> in the wild, it’s important to have meaningful layers of protection.
> 
> And! I’ll be live on the Linux Action Show this Sunday, talking
> about Shellshock and other things.
> 
> * http://fedoramagazine.org/tag/shellshock/
> * http://fedoramagazine.org/shellshock-how-does-it-actually-work/
> * https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/26/frequently-asked-questions-about-the-shellshock-bash-flaws/
> * http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/71122.html
> * http://www.jupiterbroadcasting.com/tag/linux-action-show/
> 
> 
> In Which Adam Fixes Everything
> ------------------------------
> 
> Fedora QA Community Monkey (no, really, that’s his title) Adam
> Williamson apparently does not need to sleep, and in the midst of all of
> the Shellshock fun, spent about 36 hours straight cleaning up some of
> the documentation in the Fedora wiki around our release schedule and
> process. Some of this is only of interest if you’re deeply involved in
> Fedora development or QA, but if you’re following Fedora prereleases
> (like the alpha!) — and possibly if you have been confused previously —
> it’s all a lot better now, with more consistent names and documentation
> that actually reflects reality. Take a look at
> 
> * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle
> * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes
> 
> and about three dozen interlinked pages which are now all nicely
> consistent and much more beautiful than they were before. This is a
> great example of how "just do it!" works in wikis and open source in
> general — some discussion on IRC and mailing lists, but no waiting to
> act. Thanks to Adam for seeing a mess and making it better!
> 
> Flock Possibilities
> -------------------
> 
> Flock (our big annual contributor conference) will be held in North
> America next summer — but where? We have four bids, all in the United
> States:
> 
> * Salt Lake City, Utah
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flock2015-SaltLakeCity-proposal
> 
> * Colorado Springs, Colorado
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flock2015-ColoradoSprings-proposal
> 
> * Rochester, New York
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flock2015-Rochester-proposal
> 
> * Cape Cod, Massachusetts
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flock2015-CapeCod-proposal
> 
> The Flock planning team is working on putting together a side-by-side
> feature and cost comparison, and will soon be running a straw poll to
> find the preferences of potential attendees.
> 
> Robyn on Distros and DevOps — and User Communication
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> Former Fedora Project Leader Robyn Bergeron has an interesting blog
> post about "distros and silos, devops and open source". She talks about
> several things (all worth reading), but one of the most interesting is
> the suggestion she floats for a User Committee. What do you think?
> Would a Fedora User Committee help improve our communication and break
> down silos?
> 
> * http://robyn.io/2014/09/24/distros-and-silos-devops-and-open-source/
> 
> ----
> 
> Repost note: for the past couple of months, I've just been posting this
> to the magazine and not reposting to mailing lists. The mailing list
> posts weren't getting a lot of response. I'm trying it again this week,
> though — let me know if it's useful to have it here. You can also
> follow using the RSS feed at <http://fedoramagazine.org/tag/5tftw/feed/>.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-join/attachments/20140929/c624c0e3/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-join mailing list