Ooops, we made Linus leave : (choices and punishment)
José Matos
jamatos at fc.up.pt
Tue Jan 27 00:18:01 UTC 2009
On Monday 26 January 2009 20:08:08 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> However.... Xorg 1.5 BETA. common. RPM RC3 are you guys serious. What I
> expect is that when a distro declares a stable release that the software
> has been tested enough to satisfaction of the developers to release a
> "stable" version. If it ain't stable it ain't stable. And if you
> incorporate unstable core backends like Xorg or RPM then the distro is
> certainly not "stable".
Different developers have different ideas about what a release number means.
Instead of complaining that you are using beta versions please show the bugs
you are having because you are using the rc3 of rpm.
When was the last time that rpm failed on you?
Clearly if the maintainer of rpm that is also the packager for Fedora has
decided to release it for a stable version of Fedora why is he wrong?
I have managed and released some projects where sometimes we kept the rc stage
because there were problems in the windows port. Does that mean that we can
not release it for Fedora because we want more tests on windows?
Ignoring that developers only care about Fedora when developing software it is
not what you thing but it is what you are implying, because for you stable
means in the context of Fedora.
You can not complain that 4.0.0 (deemed releasable by the developers) was beta
because according to your previous comment 4.0.0 was "stable" (for some
definition of stable). That means that we only trust the stable versions
sometimes?
Surely I know that kde developers warned about 4.0.0 but I have seen other
cases where that warning was not present.
Notice also that different programs have different dependencies and using
compatibility versions is not an answer, or else the complexity of the system
would grow up quite easily.
The stability problem is not easy and there are no silver bullets but to judge
a package just by its release number is not a proof of that.
> Like I said... Bleeding Edge good. Just plain bleeding very bad. :).
>
> Eli
--
José Abílio
More information about the kde
mailing list