When is Konqueror going to become a real browser ? Why hasn't it matured ?

[Linuxguy123]

On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:06 +0000, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:52:28 Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > I knew that... I was hoping someone had an inside scoop or reason why
> > its the way it is.
> 
> Several of us have (probably) some ideas why that has happened, on the other 
> hand your preamble will turn us way from giving any kind of answer.
> 
> For example what do you understand as a real browser? Do (e)links, lynx or 
> dillo (among others) qualify? If the they don't qualify why are there users 
> using them to browse the net?
> 
> If you define a real browser as browser that deals with all the pages, then I 
> am sorry but there aren't any. No single browser deals with all pages (imagine 
> those IE-only pages, as an example) so there are no real browsers. QED.

When will Konqueror work as well as Firefox does as far as handling
webpages without errors ?