what is stable?

[Eli Wapniarski]

On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:09:10 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > If you mean that KDE 4.3 and KDE 4.4 final will not be stable
>
> I think what *I* can boil-down from this conversation is varying
> degrees, definitions, interpretations of what it means to be:
> * usable
> * stable
> * releasable
>
> I'd welcome a conversation to be able to be able to (as much as
> possible) clearly define what we (fedora) consider these to be, so that
> when any such future confusion arises, we can point to the bright neon
> sign (wiki page?) outlining such.
>

I think this is a very good idea. How do we begin in an orderly fashion? 
Perhaps you could start the ball rolling with your thoughts and we can all 
take it from there.

Eli

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.