gpg problems

[g]

Anne Wilson wrote:

> It seems that now you have to mark a key as 'Ultimately Trusted' before you
> can encrypt with it.
> 
> This feels totally wrong to me, but there's nothing I can do about it.

i agree. but i guess that is one of pleasures of authoring a program, you
have the right to change what you want when you want, even if it is just
to keep users on their toes. :)

glad you got it worked out. now you can sleep even better tonight.

-- 

peace out.

tc,hago.

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090727/53f25d5b/attachment.bin