Has Anybody Seen Bug Fixes for Anything?

[Eelko Berkenpies]

On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:48:14 -0400, Ben Boeckel <MathStuf at gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Eelko Berkenpies wrote:
> 
>> There is being worked on one; http://rekonq.sourceforge.net/
>> 
>> I don't know if it will be a default browser but it makes an 
> good
>> alternative for Konqueror anyway. :)
>> 
>> I'm working on getting it properly packaged for Fedora. I got 
> an older
>> package wrapped up here: http://berkenpies.nl/rekonq/ (spec 
> needs work for
>> the new version, 0.1.0, and I have to make sure I got 
> everything covered
>> for review). The plan is to get it in to review before the 
> end of next
>> week.
> We'll see how it goes. I'm not holding by breath for these 
> Konqueror replacements. The project making the KPart to get 
> WebKit integration is the one that, IMO, is Doing It Right 
> instead of making a new browser from scratch.
> 
> - --Ben

Alright, I managed to wrap things up (a bit later as expected though). But
hey, better late then never they say. :)

I've packaged rekonq 0.1.0 for F11 and F12/rawhide. It should pretty much
comply with the Package Guidelines and I'll submit it for review later.
Although I'd appreciate it if someone could check it out if they are
interested in a small, nifty, KDE4 browser.

Fedora 11:
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F11/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm

Rawhide:
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F12/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm

Everything (spec / sources / rpms):
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkoitM4ACgkQiPi+MRHG3qRRDwCfQX8svoGcVXZWGw8hKHYdX/sZ
> n9IAoIue38EVR9Xmpklx4Ga25YtavKWo
> =LYG7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,
Eelko Berkenpies