Has Anybody Seen Bug Fixes for Anything?

[Eelko Berkenpies]

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:07:56 +0300, Eli Wapniarski
<eli at orbsky.homelinux.org> wrote:
> On Monday 15 June 2009 15:09:10 Eelko Berkenpies wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:48:14 -0400, Ben Boeckel <MathStuf at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> > 
>> > Eelko Berkenpies wrote:
>> > 
>> >> There is being worked on one; http://rekonq.sourceforge.net/
>> >> 
>> >> I don't know if it will be a default browser but it makes an 
>> > good
>> >> alternative for Konqueror anyway. :)
>> >> 
>> >> I'm working on getting it properly packaged for Fedora. I got 
>> > an older
>> >> package wrapped up here: http://berkenpies.nl/rekonq/ (spec 
>> > needs work for
>> >> the new version, 0.1.0, and I have to make sure I got 
>> > everything covered
>> >> for review). The plan is to get it in to review before the 
>> > end of next
>> >> week.
>> > We'll see how it goes. I'm not holding by breath for these 
>> > Konqueror replacements. The project making the KPart to get 
>> > WebKit integration is the one that, IMO, is Doing It Right 
>> > instead of making a new browser from scratch.
>> > 
>> > - --Ben
>> 
>> Alright, I managed to wrap things up (a bit later as expected though).
>> But
>> hey, better late then never they say. :)
>> 
>> I've packaged rekonq 0.1.0 for F11 and F12/rawhide. It should pretty
much
>> comply with the Package Guidelines and I'll submit it for review later.
>> Although I'd appreciate it if someone could check it out if they are
>> interested in a small, nifty, KDE4 browser.
>> 
>> Fedora 11:
>>
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F11/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm
>> 
>> Rawhide:
>>
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F12/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm
>> 
>> Everything (spec / sources / rpms):
>> http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/
>> 
>> 
> 
> Unfortunately I will not have the time to review. However, I have just
> rebuilt the package of f11 x86_64. For an alpha version it certainly is
> promising, but there are still an awful lot of rough spots.
> 
> The effort is very much appreciated
> 
> Eli

Thanks for having a look at it. The fact that it looks promising drew my
attention too. As far as I know some of the issues have been polished
already and a new version might be released soon. 0.1.2 is in the current
development GIT repository.

<shameless ad> The review request is now up at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 </shameless ad>

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,
Eelko Berkenpies