High resource usage for Konq, nspluginviewer and Xorg...
Patrick Boutilier
boutilpj at ednet.ns.ca
Thu Feb 25 21:56:30 UTC 2010
On 02/25/2010 05:13 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Linuxguy123<linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:09 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The 64bit flash without nspluginwrapper is more resource friendly here.
>>>>>
>>>>>> video is nvidia proprietary (rpmfusion).
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, that's a problem.
>>>>
>>>> We've seen various people on this list blame the proprietary nvidia
>>>> driver for various problems before and it hasn't turned out to be the
>>>> issue. What proof do you have ?
>>>
>>> And we had enough flame posts about it on the different fedora-* lists
>>> Not going to have another one.
>>> I think you know the problems of a closed source driver. If not, it is
>>> not supported by us.
>>
>> Could you please smear the closed source driver a bit more ? Just
>> because its closed source doesn't mean its bad.
>>
>> So what if its not supported by "us". Maybe the problem isn't in the
>> closed source driver. Maybe its in a, gulp, Fedora component ! Have
>> you even looked ?
>
> What's the real problem? You think you have to fight something
> personal with me? Then simply tell me what.
>
> Closed source drivers aren't supported by us == Fedora. It counts for
> any closed source software.
> If you think that isn't right, go on and change it.
>
I think what he is saying is that not every bug found by a user running
the Nvidia proprietary driver is necessarily an Nvidia bug.
More information about the kde
mailing list