Systray (was Re: F22 / KDE5)

[Emilio Recio]

But the point that I am trying to make is that KF5 should have provided
for a transitional phase for developers. Both side-by-side.

Further, what is the argument for the new standard. The only thing I
read was "you can make your icons prettier and in the right size". This
is not an excuse for removing basic functionality,

-e

On 09/15/15 10:52, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Of course it's lame.  lame is better than nothing.
>
> Application developers have known (or should have known) for years now that classic xembed systray was deprecated and would be going away soon, and that they should support the newer status-notifier-based standards (or move away from systray icons altogether).
>
> -- Rex
>
> ________________________________________
> From: kde-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org <kde-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org> on behalf of Emilio Recio <Emilio.Recio at jefferson.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:43 AM
> To: KDE on Fedora discussion
> Subject: Re: F22 / KDE5
>
> I tried that, and it is lame. (Personal opinion) All of my apps
> (audacious, pidgin, davmail - java apps, etc.) just don't dock anymore,
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
>
The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent or urgent health care matters.