gtk2 on epel won't be easy

Farkas Levente lfarkas at lfarkas.org
Sat Nov 8 23:57:42 UTC 2008


Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 10:53:21PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> In response to this thread:
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2008-October/000001.html
>>>
>>> As the packages get added to Fedora CVS, I'm requesting EL-5 branch
>>> and building them.  Part of the reason is that oVirt _may_ wish to
>>> build a Windows client on RHEL/EPEL, and they have requested this.
>>> Another reason is that there seems to be interest from CentOS users.
>>>
>>> It'd be useful to have EPEL co-maintainers though to make this task
>>> easier.
>> i can do that if you like, but i rather modify fedora's spec file in
>> order to be able to build both fedora nad epel pacakges too (in this not
>> too much work will have as a co-maintainer).
> 
> You're all set up with a Fedora (FAS) account right?  If so I'll set
> you up as co-maintainer on new EPEL packages.
> 
> With Fedora/EPEL CVS, just in case you're not familiar, each branch
> (ie. F-9/F-10/F-11/EL-5) has its own specfile, sources and patches, so
> everything is separate.

but i still prefer common spec files...

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"



More information about the mingw mailing list