Discuss: Base packages for Win32 / Win64 / OS X cross-compilation
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Feb 12 11:29:36 UTC 2009
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:31:17AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:40:54PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> > i can risk it!
> > let's ask fesco!
> There is no possible way we can do this before the Fedora 11 features
> deadline. Going back through FESCO would take a minimum of two weeks,
> assuming it went smoothly, which is highly unlikely. Then we'd have
> to do full reviews of 31 packages again.
Given where we are in release process, I think maintaining focus on
mingw32 only for F11 is the right thing. Then have a new feature for
F12 'Fedora generalized cross compilers' to re-architect things to
cope with OS-X / Win64 (and whatever else people care about)
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the mingw