[Fedora-spins] remix-logos

Jeroen van Meeuwen kanarip at kanarip.com
Wed Mar 11 01:36:46 UTC 2009


Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>> I'm late and not as educated a remixer myself.  I'm running a
>>> livecd-creator process right now to see what happens in the generic-*
>>> case.  Would it make sense to have the Fedora Remix logos appear in
>>> the generic-logos package by default?
>>>
>> In my opinion, we should have a generic package that just debrands.
> 
> Don't we have already have that with generic-logos? My opinion is that 
> by making available fedora-remix-logos, we can encourage remixes to give 
> Fedora credit which is the whole point of the secondary brand.
> 

Yes Rahul..., we have debranding in the form of generic-logos...

So, the actual question was, whether the remix logos should be shipped 
in the generic-logos package instead of being in their own 
fedora-remix-logos package.

My answer to that question was, that we should have a package that just 
debrands, in my opinion no less.

That would at the very least maintain the current situation with a 
fedora-logos trademark package, and a generic-logos debrand package. 
Hence the remix logos should go into their own package.

How was this unclear exactly?

-Jeroen



More information about the spins mailing list