[Fedora-spins] [spin-kickstarts] fedora-live-mini.ks: Don't prelink this either. The mini images are even less likely to want that ki

[Kevin Kofler]

On Thursday 07 April 2011, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 07:58 +0000 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > commit 596ef8e70cb7369826e8b9d45a0c56e2cc39ddd0
> > Author: Kevin Kofler <Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>
> > Date:   Thu Apr 7 09:58:07 2011 +0200
> > 
> >     fedora-live-mini.ks: Don't prelink this either.
> >     The mini images are even less likely to want that kind of a size
> >     increase.
> 
> The owner of the mini image explicitly agreed to this change.
> 
> Let me quote you from #fedora-kde:
> 
> (09:30:04) Kevin_Kofler: Hmmm, but prelink was already run on April 2
> and there the i386 image wasn't oversized. Weird.
> (09:30:57) Kevin_Kofler: I'm not sure whether the size increase is
> really prelink's fault or whether it's just a fluke.
> 
> In other words: You have no idea what it going on.

Actually I do. I only figured it out after I made those comments. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679880#c15
The reason for the difference between i386 and x86_64 on April 2 is that the 
i386 prelink failed because -m wasn't used. So i386 only got the bloat the 
next day when that got fixed.

> YOu don't read the meeting minutes, you don't bother to contact the spins
> SIG and you don't even have a clue if it was really the fault prelink - but
> still you revert the change. This is unprofessional and unacceptable.

Sorry, but this is urgent because the RC1 compose is imminent!

        Kevin Kofler