[Fedora-spins] spin-kickstarts branching?

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed Aug 15 17:40:08 UTC 2012


On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:31:37 -0500
Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:

> In the past we used to wait to branch spin-kickstarts until almost
> the next release. This was because it avoided having to do commits to
> two branches (in most cases) and with very little work being done
> specifically for the release past the next one.
> 
> For F17 we did the branch close to when the release branched. It was 
> anticipated that some F18 work would be going on before F17 was
> released. There didn't appear to be many issues as a result of this
> change. People seemed to remember to commit to both branches. Git
> makes this easier than perhaps it would have been under CVS. We did
> have one case where a merge of master back into F17 was done instead
> of cherry picking, but that wasn't too hard to fix.
> 
> Given that background, what would people like to see happen for F18?
> 
> I am slightly in favor of branching now, but if most want to wait
> until some F19 specific changes are needed, that would be OK with me.

I'd be fine with branching now... 

I think it's less confusing and matches our other processes better. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/attachments/20120815/70d18bb9/attachment.sig>


More information about the spins mailing list