[Fedora-spins] spins in f19

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:29:34 +0000
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:

> What about using the Feature process to get them approved?

Well, they all followed the process in f18, so I would say just add
them in... but sure. For new ones just making them do that might be
fine. 

...snip...

> > I was thinking we should require at each freeze point that any
> > spins we promote on spins.fedoraproject.org have at least 2 people
> > sign off that they tested them and they basically work. If 0 people
> > do this sign off, we should still produce them, but they sit in alt
> > and don't get promoted anywhere. If a spin doesn't get any testing
> > for an entire cycle, we drop them completely.
> 
> Sounds reasonable. What about getting them into the QA process?

Well, QA only formally tests desktop and kde. Anything else is just a
nice to do, there's no requirement or resources for it. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/attachments/20130125/8c3d7160/attachment-0001.sig>