[Fedora-spins] spins removed from Beta

Jaroslav Reznik jreznik at redhat.com
Tue Nov 12 09:49:05 UTC 2013


----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:56:57 -0500,
>    Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >I'd say the Go/No-Go should be the break point to release/not to release as
> >for primary offering. It could be a part of the Go/No-Go meeting to state
> >release readiness of all deliverables we have (based on the sign offs or
> >directly in the meeting?).
> 
> For consistancy and blame I think that is a good idea. Dennis shouldn't
> feel the heat for when screw ups result in a spin being dropped. Having
> it done at that point also keeps people from hoping for some float to
> get the sign off done.
> 
> >Do we have anything as
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_20_Beta_RC5_Desktop
> >for marking tests passed or just
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Spins?
> 
> I don't think so.
> 
> >I'm not going to comment what's written bellow, I think Dennis covered it
> >pretty well. I'm sorry if I missed the spis process, I know it was happening
> >and now I know it's enforced - so let's try to find the way how to put it
> >into schedule, communicate it better. It's definitely worth having it, and
> >I'd
> >be more than happy to help with it!
> 
> This policy is change is something that should have been communicated to you,
> so there is blame to go around. I could have thought of doing that since
> I see enough to have been able to draw the conclusion that this is something
> that should have been on the spins schedule.

Current spins schedule is at [1], is the rest of tasks still valid? I'm going 
to add sign off there too.

Jaroslav 

[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-spins-tasks.html


More information about the spins mailing list