l10n qa test feedback

A S Alam apreet.alam at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 16:15:57 UTC 2012

ਮੰਗਲਵਾਰ  02 ਅਕਤੂਬਰ 2012 12:16 ਸ਼ਾਮ ਨੂੰ, Noriko Mizumoto ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
> Hi fltg team
> Here is some feedback:
> [anaconda test]
> Test matrix says 'this testing is optional as anaconda is not stable
> enough for installation testing'. But actually anaconda did work
> somewhat thus I was able to install f18 (it was unpleasant experience
> though). I am afraid of that this warning can cause testers to walk away
> from filling any result. I think, regardless it is stable or unstable, a
> test should be performed and the result to be entered. So that a bug is
> filed, giving another pressure to the developer to fix. No bug is taken
> as 'good' from l10n side. How you think?
> [comps test]
> If my understanding is correct, comps is part of the installer
> (anaconda) and should be tested during installation process. However,
> this test entry shows up after 'chkconfig'. Once installation completes,
> comps sole test can not be performed. Therefore again, no result has
> been filled atm. Next time, it might be better to have anaconda and
> comps in one entry, how you think?
> [Others]
> There are some packages not available for test and tagged as 'this is
> currently not ready to test' in Comments. Other than firstboot, I am not
> sure why is that. Has any bug/ticket been filed? If so, could you add
> the bug/ticket number, so that tester who has interest can read?

thanks for feedback.

A S Alam


More information about the fltg mailing list