[Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584





------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  2008-04-14 03:34 EST -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> * We don't want to have version embedded with font names

It's your choice to make of course. My advice as a packager would be to have a
foo-a.b.tar.bz2 for font foo with license X packaged as foo-fonts-x.y, and a
bar-c.d.tar.bz2 for font bar with license Y packaged as bar-fonts-c.d, but you
can perfectly choose srpm multiplexing hell with a single source archive mixing
all sorts of different stuff. The user will mostly not see the difference
(except when trying to locate the right component to report bugs on), all the
complexity will be packager-side.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.