[Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 4 21:18:14 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |
|aposte.net) |
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-02-04 16:18:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> So far, the package names were as follows:
>
> SRPM: terminus-font
> RPM: terminus-font-x11
> (X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes)
> RPM: terminus-font-console
> (console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets)
>
> The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named
> [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase".
>
> I can't see any foundry,
foundry is just a shorthand for upstream, if an upstream releases several fonts
so they are clearly grouped together. It is optional
> upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean
> fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname",
Font family name is nothing special that's how your font calls itself in GUI
font lists. You can't have a font file without a familyname or apps would not
know how to refer to it.
> so my package would
> need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"?
"When foundryname, projectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts
affix, this affix should be dropped from them"
Don't panic and just read attentively
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Clarifications you'll see
this kind of case is covered
> Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could
> sound better and be less redundant and confusing.
>
> Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will
> call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the
> [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme.
This is ok
> But what happens with the console fonts?
Console fonts can't be processed by fontconfig so they're not a "font" covered
by the guidelines and you can name the subpackage that contains them whatever
you want, as long as it's not some form of foo-fonts
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the fonts-bugs
mailing list