[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 7 09:23:29 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |
                   |aposte.net)                 |




--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-01-07 04:23:27 EDT ---
Those other pages that were approved yesterday by FPC (minutes not posted yet)
may also be relevant for VLGothic
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22)

You probably want to perform the naming changes at the same time.
To change a srpm naming, the current procedure is to orphan the old package in
rawhide, and post a review request with the new name (I'll approve it as a
matter of course if you do so)

This will be discussed this evening by FESCO, you may want to add some input
here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages

As for the upgrade path, you have two choices:
1. If there is a clear mapping between the old packages and the new packages,
use obsoletes inside the packages
2. If there is not use a compat package to garbage collect the old packages as
has been done for dejavu in rawhide

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list