[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461





--- Comment #12 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr>  2009-01-14 04:14:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> After a mail exchange with Tom the new naming rules will probably look like
> that
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13)
> 
> As your package is one of the most complex naming-wise please check you're ok
> with the proposal (or suggest amendments)

I am ok with most of the proposal.  I have some doubts about the TeX-related
subpackage.

One is whether tex should be a prefix or a suffix.

The other is whether the foundry name (ctan) should be in the package name. 
After all, we do not name all the perl modules perl-cpan-perlmodule.

But I guess this is not so critical, can be left unspecified (it is after all a
TeX related subpackage) and wait for some input from the TeX guys.  

(My preference would be that tex should be a prefix and the ctan deleted as in
tex-cm-lgc).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.