[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |rbhalera at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-01-18 15:42:18 EDT ---
You still need to take care of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_font_packaging_changes_are_needed_with_post-1.13_fontpackages_.3F

Since FPC unexpectedly decided to change our package naming rules.

Apart that is looks nice so I'm going to approve it now and let you take care
of the naming before the Fedora import.

You can now continue starting from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a
⇒ re-assigning

Thank you for packaging a new font in Fedora

✻✻✻ APPROVED ✻✻✻

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.