[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416


Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |oget.fedora at gmail.com
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #22 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-01-24 16:55:26 EDT ---
Thanks for your work but, sorry, this is not done yet.

The guidelines state that the Type1 fonts need to be packaged separately. I
already send an email to you (I wasn't aware of the presence of this bug),
asking to split those .pfb fonts into yet another subpackage. For instance,
this is done for the musixtex (ref: bug #481071 and bug #481070 ).

If you'd ask me how I ended up here: I wanted to package the guitar tablature
editor "ktabedit" and ktabedit needs those .pfb files. And it won't be
appropriate to make ktabedit require lilypond just for this reason.

Can you please add subpackage(s) for each families of those Type1 .pfb fonts?
Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.