[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 29 21:37:49 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Clone Of|481476                      |
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |roozbeh at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-01-29 16:37:48 EDT ---
Packaging is sane and upgrade path works

⬔⬔⬔ APPROVED ⬔⬔⬔

However:

— Please consider adding some explanation in the alt subpackage description on
the difference between alt and normal (it's in the package FAQ)

— Please consider adding fontconfig rules that make each font family substiture
for the other and for the gentium basic variants

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list