[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 29 22:07:12 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roozbeh at gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-01-29 17:07:11 EDT ---
1. probably better to use -n with %setup instead of using -c and playing mv
games
2. Please consider
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Am_I_done_after_creating_a_new_fonts_.28sub.29package_or_renaming_an_existing_one.3F
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F
However, despite the uglyness associated to 1., the package and upgrade path
works.
⬕⬕⬕ APPROVED ⬕⬕⬕
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the fonts-bugs
mailing list